Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 31;60(1):126–135. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00919-15

TABLE 1.

Effect of treatments on development of dental caries in rats (Keyes' score)a

Treatment Smooth-surface caries Smooth-surface severity
Sulcal-surface caries Sulcal-surface severity (mean [SD])
Dsb Dmc Ds Dm Dxd
Negative control (deionized water) 24.0 (7.9)A 13.2 (6.6)A 2.4 (1.8)A 43.2 (4.6)A 38.6 (2.8)A 21.6 (4.4)A 8.0 (5.1)A
Vehicle control (1% DMSO) 22.8 (6.3)A 16.0 (8.8)A 0.8 (1.3)A 42.6 (7.6)A 41.8 (1.1)A 19.2 (5.8)A 5.0 (5.7)A
Fluoride (250 ppm) 11.0 (4.1)B 2.4 (2.6)B NDe 27.4 (5.7)B 23.0 (4.2)B 7.4 (3.5)BC ND
Compound (5 μg/ml) 14.2 (5.1)AB 2.8 (1.3)B ND 39.2 (3.8)AC 34.8 (6.2)A 14.2 (4.1)AC 0.8 (0.8)B
Compound (10 μg/ml) 10.0 (3.9)B 2.4 (2.1)B ND 30.8 (4.3)BC 22.2 (3.4)B 2.8 (2.7)B ND
a

Table values denote means with SD in parentheses (n = 5). Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different from each other (P > 0.05) (ANOVA; comparison for all pairs using the Tukey-Kramer HSD).

b

Ds, dentin exposed.

c

Dm, 3/4 of the dentin affected.

d

Dx, whole dentin affected.

e

ND, not detectable.