Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 13;4(3):e17. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.4257

Table 1.

Characteristics of participants who completed group and individual interviews.

Interview types Pseudonyms Sex Age Body mass index Number of concurrent medications Highest level of education Interview method
Pilot group interviews

Anne Female 74 22.0 1 High school certificate or diploma Face-to-face (group interview #1)

Betty Female 75 24.4 0 Some university without certificate or diploma Face-to-face (group interview #1)

Claire Female 82 21.2 2 University degree Face-to-face (group interview #1)

Dana Female 85 28.1 0 Grades 9-13, without certificate or diploma Face-to-face (group interview #2)

Edna Female 77 25.2 2 University degree Face-to-face (group interview #2)
In-depth individual interviews

Frank Male 78 32.3 0 High school certificate or diploma Face-to-Face

Gabby Female 81 29.1 3 University certificate or diploma Face-to-Face

Holly Female 81 28.8 2 Some university without certificate or diploma Face-to-Face

Ida Female 82 30.1 11 High school certificate or diploma Telephone

Jenny Female 88 28.0 0 Trades or professional certificate or diploma Telephone

Katy Female 81 21.3 3 High school certificate or diploma Telephone

Lacy Female 75 29.5 1 High school certificate or diploma Telephone

Mary Female 97 30.8 4 Trades or professional certificate or diploma Telephone

Ned Male 90 30.6 0 Grades 9-13, without certificate or diploma Telephone

Oliver Male 77 32.2 2 University degree Telephone

Patty Female 82 31.3 0 Grades 9-13, without certificate or diploma Telephone

Quinn Male 84 25.0 2 High school certificate or diploma Telephone

Roberta Female 77 24.4 3 University degree Telephone

Sandra Female 82 26.7 3 University certificate or diploma Telephone

Thomas Male 84 31.4 3 Trades or professional certificate or diploma Telephone

Walter Male 79 27.9 3 High school certificate or diploma Telephone