Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 29;10(12):e0145784. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145784

Table 2. Bacterial genera detected a in cecum content of mice administered saline (control) or Lactobacillus casei 32G once per day by oral gavage sorted based on time.

Taxon Percentage (mean ± SE) b c
0.5h 3.5h 12h 24h
Control Low Medium High Control Low Medium High Control Low Medium High Control Low Medium High
S24-7 IS 66.2±15.2 61.4±27.7 70.4±13.0 64.3±25.3 75.0±15.8 81.3±17.5 65.9±5.9 69.7±15.6 84.6±10.3 86.2±5.9 78.8±20.3 74.1±14.0 53.6±22.0 70.8±20.7 52.9±31.2 60.9±18.1
Lachnospiraceae IS 15.9±9.9 26.1±25.0 13.8±9.6 13.2±8.5 8.9±7.2 8.0±10.2 13.9±8.3 2.7±1.6 7.1±6.0 3.3±2.5 12.2±14.6 8.8±8.4 28.8±19.7 12.3±11.3 10.7±12.2 10.2±6.7
Oscillospira 10.0±4.7 3.8±1.6 5.9±3.9 4.3±4.1 3.3±3.0 2.7±3.6 2.0±1.3 0.8±0.6 2.4±2.8 1.0±0.6 2.1±2.7 1.9±1.6 7.2±3.3 7.1±6.2 4.9±4.9 4.2±3.1
Ruminococcaceae Other 2.1±1.2 3.2±2.3 1.2±0.8 2.4±1.9 0.6±0.3 1.4±0.6 0.5±0.2 1.5±1.0 2.0±1.4 3.3±1.9 2.0±2.1 8.3±4.1 2.3±1.4 3.2±1.9 2.6±2.5 2.2±0.9
Ruminococcus 1.3±0.6 1.1±0.7 0.4±0.2 1.2±1.4 0.7±0.4 0.5±0.4 0.2±0.1 0.7±0.8 1.0±0.5 1.9±1.4 0.7±0.8 1.2±0.7 0.8±0.3 1.0±0.3 0.6±0.5 1.4±1.2
Clostridia Other 1.2±0.8 1.0±0.6 0.4±0.4 0.7±0.7 0.3±0.1 0.6±0.6 0.2±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.5±0.5 0.6±0.3 0.3±0.2 0.6±0.5 0.9±0.3 0.8±1.2 0.7±0.7 0.8±0.6
Lactobacillus 0.9±1.6 0.5±0.9 5.0±4.6 11.0±16.4 6.8±7.7 3.6±6.9 15.0±9.6 22.2±14.6 0.4±0.5 0.6±0.9 0.6±0.4 1.9±2.7 3.7±4.3 1.1±1.0 24.8±17.3 16.9±19.5
Lachnospiraceae Other 0.9±0.4 0.9±0.5 0.4±0.2 0.7±0.6 0.3±0.2 0.3±0.4 0.2±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.4±0.5 0.7±0.8 0.3±0.2 0.6±0.5 0.8±0.4 1.1±1.5 0.5±0.5 0.8±0.4
Clostridiales Other 0.6±0.3 0.6±0.4 0.5±0.4 0.4±0.4 0.1±0.1 0.3±0.3 0.2±0.1 0.1±0.1 0.3±0.3 0.2±0.1 0.3±0.2 0.6±0.5 0.6±0.3 0.5±0.3 0.6±0.8 0.4±0.2
Ruminococcaceae IS 0.2±0.1 0.3±0.4 0.9±0.6 0.7±0.9 0.3±0.2 0.2±0.3 0.6±0.3 0.8±0.4 0.2±0.1 0.6±0.7 1.0±0.6 0.8±0.5 0.2±0.1 0.4±0.2 0.4±0.3 0.5±0.2
Firmicutes Other 0.2±0.1 0.1±0.2 0.2±0.1 0.2±0.2 0.2±0.1 0.2±0.2 0.2±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.2±0.2 0.2±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.1±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.4±0.3 0.4±0.2 0.4±0.2
Bacteria Other 0.2±0.0 0.1±0.1 0.3±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.4±0.2 0.3±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.1±0.0 0.2±0.1 0.4±0.2 0.2±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.3±0.1 0.5±0.1
Erysipelotrichaceae IS 0.1±0.1 0.2±0.2 0.1±0.1 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.1±0.0 0.1±0.1 0.0±0.0 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.1 0.2±0.2 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.1±0.1 0.1±0.0 0.1±0.0
Turicibacter 0.0±0.1 0.1±0.2 0.0±0.0 0.3±0.4 2.7±2.6 0.2±0.2 0.1±0.2 0.4±0.7 0.4±0.5 0.8±0.9 0.8±1.1 0.4±0.5 0.1±0.1 0.3±0.3 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.1
Coprobacillaceae IS 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.1±0.1 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 0.2±0.2 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0
Adlercreutzia BQL 0.1±0.1 0.2±0.1 0.0±0.0 0.2±0.5 0.1±0.2 0.3±0.2 0.1±0.0 0.1±0.2 0.1±0.2 0.2±0.1 0.0±0.0 0.1±0.0 0.2±0.3 0.2±0.2 0.1±0.1
Coriobacteriales IS BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.0±0.0 BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL BQL 0.0±0.0 0.0±0.0 BQL 0.2±0.2
Number of alterations d - 2 8 4 - 3 6 6 - 2 2 6 - 5 7 9

aOnly genera that were present at ≥1% in a sample are included in this table.

bThe detection limit was 0.00003 and this value was used to calculate the p-value.

cGenera that differ from control within each group are shown in bold (p≤0.05).

dThe number of genera that differed from the control for that treatment.

IS: Incertae Sedis.

BQL: Below quantifiable limit.