. 2016 Jan 8;6:1997. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01997

Table 2.

Results of multilevel autoregressive models estimating average levels of emotional inertia.

Model	Est. (SE)	95% CI		SD	Est. (SE)	95% CI		SD
	Study 1 (N = 100)				Study 2 (N = 202)
	Fixed effect (β₁₀)			Random effect (r₁)	Fixed effect (β₁₀)			Random effect (r₁)
		LL	UL			LL	UL
NE inertia (Raw)	0.40 (0.02)	0.35	0.45	0.10	0.33 (0.02)	0.29	0.36	0.11
NE inertia (Standardized)^a	0.25 (0.03)	0.20	0.30	0.14	0.22 (0.02)	0.19	0.25	0.06
PE inertia (Raw)	0.31 (0.02)	0.26	0.36	0.09	0.25 (0.02)	0.22	0.29	0.09
PE inertia (Standardized)	0.22 (0.02)	0.17	0.26	0.06	0.15 (0.01)	0.12	0.18	0.02

Fixed effect estimates representing average levels of emotional inertia are significantly different from zero at p < 0.001.

^an = 98 for analyses using standardized NE scores in Study 1.