Table 2. Clinical data of the 12 children having hemangioma.
| Patient No. | Sex | Age at first presentation (wk) | Gestational age (wk) | Location of hemangioma | Indication of treatment | Age at treatment (mo) | Longest×shortest diameter (cm) | Thickness† (max) (cm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1* | F | At birth | 34+1 | Multifocal (thigh, lower leg, scalp) | Disfigurement | 2.1 | 2×1.8, 3.5×2, 3.5×2.5 | 0.4 |
| 2* | F | At birth | 34+1 | Back | Disfigurement | 9.5 | 3×2 | 0.3 |
| 3 | M | 2 | Full term | Abdomen | Disfigurement | 4.1 | 7.7×5.8 | 0.2 |
| 4 | M | 1 | Full term | Lower lip | Functional risk | 1.8 | 1.8×0.8 | 0.5 |
| 5 | M | At birth | Full term | Lower lip with oral mucosa | Functional risk | 5.3 | 2.5×1.5 | 0.4 |
| 6 | M | At birth | Full term | Cheek | Rapid growth | 0.8 | 4×4 | 1.0 |
| 7 | F | At birth | Full term | Eyelid | Functional risk | 3.7 | 1.5×0.6 | 0.2 |
| 8 | F | At birth | 26+2 | Multifocal (forehead, trunk, extremity, buttock) | Disfigurement | 4.2 | ≤1.5×1 (9 hemangiomas) | ≤0.3 |
| 9 | F | 1 | Full term | Chin | Disfigurement | 3.4 | 3×2 | 0.5 |
| 10 | F | At birth | 36+3 | Wrist | Local complication (ulceration) | 3.8 | 4×2 | 0.3 |
| 11 | F | 4 | 33+4 | Back | Disfigurement | 4.0 | 3×2 | 0.3 |
| 12 | F | 2.5 | Full term | Hand | Functional risk | 1.5 | 3×3 | 0.3 |
*The two patients are twins. †Approximate value.