Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 8;6:18900. doi: 10.1038/srep18900

Table 3. Results of subgroups analyses of pooled RRs and 95% CIs.

Subgroups No. of studies Heterogeneity Effect model Meta-analysis
I2(%) ph RR (95%CI) p
Study design
Cohort 3 0 0.39 Fixed 1.02 (0.71–1.46) 0.91
Case-control 5 14.2 0.32 Fixed 1.48 (1.12–1.96) <0.01
Cross-sectional 1 NA NA NA 1.45 (0.76–2.76) 0.26
Outcomes
ESCC 7 1.2 0.42 Fixed 1.21 (0.95–1.53) 0.13
Mixed 2 36.4 0.21 Fixed 1.66 (1.08–2.54) 0.02
Definition of reference group
None lost tooth 2 0 0.64 Fixed 1.01 (0.70–1.46) 0.94
No. of lost tooth 7 6.4 0.38 Fixed 1.46 (1.14–1.89) <0.01
Effect estimation
Relative risk 1 NA NA NA 0.90 (0.48–1.68) 0.74
Hazard ratio 2 40.3 0.20 Fixed 1.09 (0.70–1.68) 0.71
Odds ratio 6 0 0.46 Fixed 1.47 (1.14–1.91) <0.01
Adjustment
Smoking 8 0 0.46 Fixed 1.37 (1.10–1.70) <0.01
Smoking and alcohol 7 10.4 0.35 Fixed 1.36 (1.08–1.71) 0.01

No., number; ESCC, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.