Table 2.

Relative abundance of taxonomies which demonstrated statistical significance after FDR adjustment. P values are for the narrowest taxonomy listed. Results shown are means, group wise and pairwise p values and FDR-adjusted p values.

Bacterial Taxonomy	Mean Relative Abundance			Raw P value / FDR P value
	N	P	D	All	N vs P	N vs D	P vs D
Synergistetes	0	0.0013%	0.0412%	*0.048	0.230/0.230	*0.032/0.095	0.120/0.181
Acidobacteria, Chloracidobacteria	0.0161%	0.0178%	0.0091%	*0.038	0.622/0.622	0.067/0.101	*0.012/*0.037
Bacteroidetes, Saprospirae	0.0300%	0.0188%	0.0278%	*0.048	*0.026/0.078	0.723/0.723	0.069/0.103
Synergistetes, Synergistia	0.0000%	0.0013%	0.0412%	*0.048	0.230/0.230	*0.032/0.095	0.120/0.181
Acidobacteria, Solibacteres, Solibacterales, Solibacteraceae, Candidatus Solibacter	0.0018%	0.0047%	0.0014%	*0.036	*0.041/0.071	1.000/1.000	0.047/0.071
Actinobacteria, Actinobacteria, Actinomycetales, Pseudonocardiaceae, (unknown genus)	0.0000%	0.0020%	0.0000%	*0.008	*0.023/*0.042	1.000/1.000	*0.028/*0.042
Actinobacteria, Coriobacteriia, Coriobacteriales, Coriobacteriaceae, Collinsella	0.0908%	0.0624%	0.2637%	*0.032	0.546/0.546	*0.025/*0.039	*0.026/*0.039
Firmicutes, Clostridia, Clostridiales, Lachnospiraceae, Lachnospira	3.1468%	1.5362%	1.5014%	*0.045	*0.019/0.058	*0.050/0.074	0.648/0.648
Firmicutes, Clostridia, Clostridiales, Veillonellaceae, Megasphaera	0.0000%	0.1013%	0.0441%	*0.036	*0.024/0.072	0.334/0.334	0.144/0.216
Firmicutes, Erysipelotrichi, Erysipelotrichales, Erysipelotrichaceae, (unknown genus)	0.5217%	0.2507%	0.1486%	*0.030	0.092/0.138	*0.017/0.051	0.141/0.141
Firmicutes, Erysipelotrichi, Erysipelotrichales, Erysipelotrichaceae, Bulleidia	0.0000%	0.0000%	0.0038%	*0.020	1.00/1.00	0.069/0.104	*0.036/0.104
Proteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Enterobacteriales, Enterobacteriaceae, (unknown genus)	0.2465%	0.4275%	3.7804%	*0.016	0.786/0.786	*0.010/*0.025	*0.017/*0.025

N=NonDM, P=PreDM, D=T2DM

^*Indicates p <0.05