Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Learn Disabil. 2015 Jul 8;50(1):62–80. doi: 10.1177/0022219415594609

Fixed and Random Effects for Group Comparisons on Articulation Measures (HLM Full Models)

Articulation-word rate
Articulation-number rate
Fixed Effects Coefficient SE T-ratio p Fixed Effects Coefficient SE T-ratio p
Model 5a Model 6a
Intercept 5.69 0.23 24.67 0.00 Intercept 7.50 0.25 30.49 0.00
Strategy vs. Control 0.21 0.29 0.72 0.47 Strategy vs. Control 0.63 0.33 1.91 0.06
No-strategy vs. Control 0.13 0.29 0.46 0.65 No-strategy vs. Control 0.03 0.33 0.08 0.94
Pre-Articulation-word rate 0.50 0.11 4.51 0.00 Pre-Articulation-number rate 0.56 0.10 5.62 0.00
Model 5b Model 6b
Intercept 5.82 0.23 24.82 0.00 Intercept 7.52 0.25 30.17 0.00
Strategy vs. No-strategy 0.07 0.29 0.25 0.80 Strategy vs. No-strategy 0.60 0.33 1.82 0.08
Control vs. No-strategy −0.13 0.29 −0.46 0.65 Control vs. No-strategy −0.03 0.33 −0.08 0.94
Pre-Articulation-word rate 0.50 0.11 4.51 0.00 Pre-Articulation-number rate 0.56 0.10 5.62 0.00

Random Effects School
level
variance
Student
level
residual
variance
χ2 BIC Random Effects School level
variance
Student
level
residual
variance
χ2 BIC


0.14 0.79 22.18* 167.74 0.09 1.02 15.57 179.91

Note. Coefficient = Unstandardized coefficient in HLM models, the mean difference between study groups adjusted for level-1 covariates; SE = Standard Errors of the coefficient, BIC = Bayesian Information Criterion. Because of Dummy coding, the Random Effects are the same for Model 5a and 5b, and Model 6a and 6b. Models 5a~6b represent the comparison of “Strategy vs. Control” and “No-strategy-instruction vs. Control”.

All coefficients in HLM models became non-significant after application of the Benjamini–Hochberg correction of p values for multiple comparisons (i.e., p < .01).

*

p < .05,

+

p < .08.