Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 8;16:4. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0526-3

Table 2.

Rating of faculty and informal mentors by the undergraduate medical students

5-item Likert scale Group #1 Group #2 Group #3 5-item Likert scale Group #1 Group #2 Group #3
N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
A) Mentor had similar career interests B) Mentor influenced my career choice
 Strongly agree (5) 3 (7.7 %) 2 (3.9 %) 24 (45.3 %)  Strongly agree (5) 0 (0.0 %) 0 (0.0 %) 24 (45.3 %)
 Agree (4) 6 (15.4 %) 6 (11.8 %) 24 (45.3 %)  Agree (4) 2 (5.1 %) 5 (10.2 %) 23 (43.4 %)
 Neutral (3) 9 (23.1 %) 14 (27.5 %) 2 (3.8 %)  Neutral (3) 14 (35.9 %) 17 (34.7 %) 4 (7.5 %)
 Disagree (2) 10 (25.6 %) 18 (35.3 %) 2 (3.8 %)  Disagree (2) 15 (38.5 %) 17 (34.7 %) 2 (3.8 %)
 Strongly disagree (1) 11 (28.2 %) 11 (21.6 %) 1 (1.9 %)  Strongly disagree (1) 8 (20.5 %) 8 (16.3 %) 0 (0.0 %)
 N 39 51 53  N 39 49 53
 Mean (SD) 2.49 (1.27) 2.41 (1.08) 4.28 (0.86)  Mean (SD) 2.26 (0.85) 2.35 (0.93) 4.3 (0.77)
 Mode 1 2 4, 5  Mode 2 2, 3 5
 Median 2 2 4  Median 2 2 4
 Groups #1 vs #2 0.90 (U value = 1010.5)  Groups #1 vs #2 0.67 (U value = 907.5)
 Groups #1 vs #3 <0.0001 (U value = 1784.5)  Groups #1 vs #3 <0.0001 (U value = 106)
 Groups #2 vs #3 <0.0001 (U value = 2294)  Groups #2 vs #3 <0.0001 (U value = 172.5)
C) Mentor was accessible D) Mentor was personally interested
 Strongly agree (5) 6 (15.4 %) 4 (7.8 %) 21 (39.6 %)  Strongly agree (5) 9 (23.1 %) 4 (8.0 %) 26 (49.1 %)
 Agree (4) 17 (43.6 %) 23 (45.1 %) 30 (56.6 %)  Agree (4) 11 (28.2 %) 23 (46.0 %) 27 (50.9 %)
 Neutral (3) 9 (23.1 %) 17 (33.3 %) 2 (3.8 %)  Neutral (3) 8 (20.5 %) 20 (40.0 %) 0 (0.0 %)
 Disagree (2) 5 (12.8 %) 6 (11.8 %) 0 (0.0 %)  Disagree (2) 9 (23.1 %) 2 (4.0 %) 0 (0.0 %)
 Strongly disagree (1) 2 (5.1 %) 1 (2.0 %) 0 (0.0 %)  Strongly disagree (1) 2 (5.1 %) 1 (2.0 %) 0 (0.0 %)
 N 39 51 53  N 39 50 53
 Mean (SD) 3.51 (1.07) 3.45 (0.88) 4.36 (0.56)  Mean (SD) 3.41 (1.23) 3.54 (0.79) 4.49 (0.5)
 Mode 4 4 4  Mode 4 4 4
 Median 4 4 4  Median 4 4 4
 Groups #1 vs #2 0.59 (U value = 1058)  Groups #1 vs #2 0.73 (U value = 934.5)
 Groups #1 vs #3 <0.0001 (U value = 553)  Groups #1 vs #3 <0.0001 (U value = 508.5)
 Groups #2 vs #3 <0.0001 (U value = 578)  Groups #2 vs #3 <0.0001 (U value = 470.5)

Group 1: Rating of faculty mentors by the students in the faculty group (those without informal mentors)

Group 2: Rating of faculty mentors by the students in the informal group (those with informal mentors)

Group 3: Rating of informal mentors by the students in the informal group

P-values were calculated using Mann Whitney test