Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2016 Jan;20(0 1):147–157. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1132-9

Table 2. Indirect Effects from Alcohol and Sexual Aggression to CUR Intentions.

Indirect Paths Unstandardized Estimate 95% C.I.
Alc total effects .07** .024, .118
Alc total indirect effects .015 -.012, .042
Alc specific indirect effects
 Alc to State impulsivity .010 -.008, .028
 Alc to State impulsivity to CUR attitudes .003 -.003, .010
 Alc to State impulsivity to CUR self-efficacy .002 -.001, .005
SA perp severity total effects .014*** .010, .019
SA perp severity total indirect effects .005*** .002, .009
SA perp severity specific indirect effects
 SA perp severity to State impulsivity .004** .001, .006
 SA perp severity to State impulsivity to CUR attitudes .001** .000, .002
 SA perp severity to State impulsivity to CUR self-efficacy .001* .000, .001

Note: C.I. = confidence interval. Alc = beverage condition (coded -1 no alc, 1 = alc). SA perp severity = Sexual Aggression Perpetration Severity. CUR = Condom Use Resistance. CUR intentions variable was natural log transformed to reduce skew.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p ≤ .001.