Table 2. Indirect Effects from Alcohol and Sexual Aggression to CUR Intentions.
Indirect Paths | Unstandardized Estimate | 95% C.I. |
---|---|---|
Alc total effects | .07** | .024, .118 |
Alc total indirect effects | .015 | -.012, .042 |
Alc specific indirect effects | ||
Alc to State impulsivity | .010 | -.008, .028 |
Alc to State impulsivity to CUR attitudes | .003 | -.003, .010 |
Alc to State impulsivity to CUR self-efficacy | .002 | -.001, .005 |
SA perp severity total effects | .014*** | .010, .019 |
SA perp severity total indirect effects | .005*** | .002, .009 |
SA perp severity specific indirect effects | ||
SA perp severity to State impulsivity | .004** | .001, .006 |
SA perp severity to State impulsivity to CUR attitudes | .001** | .000, .002 |
SA perp severity to State impulsivity to CUR self-efficacy | .001* | .000, .001 |
Note: C.I. = confidence interval. Alc = beverage condition (coded -1 no alc, 1 = alc). SA perp severity = Sexual Aggression Perpetration Severity. CUR = Condom Use Resistance. CUR intentions variable was natural log transformed to reduce skew.
p < .05,
p < .01,
p ≤ .001.