Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015 Jul 9;29:90–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.06.009

Table 4.

Spearman correlations (rs), corresponding p-values, and lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for all subjects and rotator cuff tear subjects for SST, ASES, WORC, and SF-36 pain and physical function categories.

All subjects (N=25) Rotator cuff tear subjects (N=13)
SST ASES WORC SST ASES WORC
ASES rs=0.71
(p<0.01)*
CI=0.42, 0.86		 - - rs=0.71
(p=0.01)*
CI=0.23, 0.90		 - -
WORC rs=−0.62
(p<0.01)*
CI=-0.82, −0.28		 rs=−0.70
(p<0.01)*
CI=−0.86, −0.40		 - rs=−0.66
(p=0.02)*
CI=−0.88, −0.14		 rs=−0.63
(p=0.02)*
CI=−0.87, −0.09		 -
SF-36 Pain rs=0.31
(p=0.14)
CI=−0.11, 0.63		 rs=0.51
(p=0.01)*
CI=0.13, 0.76		 rs=−0.29
(p=0.18)
CI=−0.61, 0.14		 rs=0.11
(p=0.71)
CI=−0.47, 0.62		 rs=0.47
(p=0.11)
CI=−0.13, 0.80		 rs=−0.02
(p=0.94)
CI=−0.57, 0.54
SF-36 Physical Function rs=0.62
(p<0.01)*
CI=0.28, 0.82		 rs=0.40
(p=0.05)
CI=−0.01, 0.69		 rs=−0.42
(p=0.04)*
CI=−0.70, −0.01		 rs=0.59
(p=0.04)*
CI=0.03, 0.85		 rs=0.37
(p=0.22)
CI=−0.24, 0.76		 rs=−0.56
(p=0.05)*
CI=−0.84, 0.01
*

indicates statistical significance.