Table 3.
Method | Depth | Advantage | Disadvantage |
---|---|---|---|
Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy | 1-2 mm | (i) Insensitive to scattering changes (ii) Low cost (iii) High spectral resolution |
(i) Recovery of relative absorption (ii) Low spatial resolution |
| |||
Diffuse optical tomography | up to ~4 cm | 3D reconstruction of absolute optical pharmacokinetics (OP) | (i) Expensive (ii) Bulky (iii) Low spectral resolution |
| |||
Frequency domain photon migration | up to ~4 cm | Recovery of absolute OP | (i) Low spectral resolution (ii) Expensive (iii) Low spatial resolution (iv) Not suitable for small geometries |
| |||
Diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging | up to ~4 cm | (i) 3D reconstruction of absolute OP (ii) High spectral resolution |
(i) Expensive (ii) Not suitable for small geometries |
| |||
Spatial frequency domain imaging | up to ~1 cm | (i) Noncontact (ii) High spatial resolution (iii) Depth sensitivity |
(i) Long acquisition times (ii) Expensive (commercial) |
| |||
Multispectral imaging | up to ~1 cm | (i) Low cost (ii) High spatiotemporal acquisition rate |
(i) Relative absorption values (ii) Susceptible to scattering effects (iii) No depth resolution |