Table 4.
Optimal values of nonzero design variables for the case study.
| Number | Decision variable | Optimal solution |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | x E,b,T 1,U | 136,125 |
| 2 | x E,g,T 1,U | 72,903 |
| 3 | x E,b,M 1,U | 7,425 |
| 4 | x E,b,S 1,U | 74,250 |
| 5 | x E,g,M 1,U | 3,977 |
| 6 | x E,g,S 1,U | 39,765 |
| 7 | x E,b,A 1,U | 54,450 |
| 8 | x E,g,A 1,U | 29,161 |
| 9 | x G,b,M 1,U | 7,241 |
| 10 | x G,b,S 1,U | 79,736 |
| 11 | x G,b,A 1,U | 29,156 |
| 12 | x G,g,M 1,U | 6,047 |
| 13 | x G,g,S 1,U | 78,937 |
| 14 | x G,g,A 1,U | 33,145 |
| z = sum of nonzero deviation variables | 503,555 |