Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 10.
Published in final edited form as: Health Educ Behav. 2014 Jan 13;41(3):299–306. doi: 10.1177/1090198113512126

Table 3.

Results From Five Weighted, Multivariable Logistic Regression Analyses Predicting Each Reason for Having Firearms in the Home.

Protection
Hunting
Target
Collection
Work
aOR 95% CI aOR 95% CI aOR 95% CI aOR 95% CI aOR 95% CI
Child race/ethnicity
 Non-Hispanic White
 (ref)
 African American 4.49**** 2.68, 7.50 0.14**** 0.09, 0.23 0.10**** 0.05, 0.20 0.26*** 0.13, 0.51 2.35 0.91, 6.08
 Hispanic 1.44 0.77, 2.72 0.25**** 0.15, 0.43 0.80 0.43, 1.49 0.96 0.42, 2.16 7.49*** 2.43, 23.11
 Other/multiracial 2.56* 1.07, 6.11 0.22* 0.07, 0.69 0.42 0.14, 1.32 0.46 0.14, 1.43 2.68 0.63, 10.16
Study site
 Birmingham (ref)
 Houston 1.27 0.81, 2.00 1.09 0.69, 1.72 0.76 0.51, 1.13 0.45** 0.26, 0.78 1.38 0.58, 3.28
 Los Angeles 0.73 0.41, 1.29 0.20**** 0.11, 0.38 1.20 0.67, 2.17 1.07 0.58, 1.96 1.56 0.56, 4.36
Standardized family SES
 (high relative to low)
0.83 0.62, 1.12 1.50*** 1.19, 1.89 1.56* 1.08, 2.24 1.35* 1.04, 1.74 1.17 0.68, 2.03

Note. aOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; ref = referent; SES = socioeconomic status. Sample N for all analyses = 880. Parents were permitted to offer multiple reasons for having firearms, so some participants are included in multiple analyses.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.

****

p < .0001.