Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2015 Nov 23;45(2):329–337. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0654-6

Table 2.

Logistic Multi-level Models Predicting Probability of Experiencing Interpersonal Consequences of Sex by Gender and Vaginal/Oral Sex

Intimacy Physical Satisfaction Health Guilt
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Average Odds (Vaginal Sex Day) π0
  Intercept (Female) β00 5.37*** 4.10, 7.04 6.04*** 4.66, 7.83 0.29*** 0.21, 0.39 0.25*** 0.18, 0.34
  Male β01 0.56* 0.34, 0.91 0.71 0.44, 1.14 1.15 0.71, 1.87 1.01 0.63, 1.62
  % of Days Oral Sex (Female) β02 0.23** 0.12, 0.64 0.24** 0.11, 0.52 0.66 0.29, 1.54 1.13 0.51, 2.54
  % of Days Oral Sex X Male β03 3.14+ 0.98, 10.11 3.09+ 0.99, 9.64 0.64 0.21, 1.95 0.60 0.21, 1.75
Oral Sex Days π1
  Intercept (Female) β10 0.53** 0.30, 0.92 0.26*** 0.16, 0.41 0.13*** 0.09, 0.20 0.84 0.55, 1.29
  Male β11 2.92* 1.02, 8.40 3.02* 1.22, 7.48 4.48** 1.89, 10.64 0.43** 0.24, 0.79
Non-Relationship Sex π2
  Intercept β20 0.60 0.27, 1.34 0.61 0.24, 1.51 1.40 0.76, 2.59 2.22** 1.23, 4.00
Number of Drinks π3
  Intercept β30 0.94** 0.91, 0.98 1.0 0.94, 1.06 1.06* 1.01, 1.11 1.04+ 1.00, 1.09

Note. N = 834 days, 253 individuals.

+

p<.10,

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.