Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Lung Cancer. 2015 Aug 3;17(1):18–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2015.07.006

Table 3.

Dosimetric comparison by treatment technique

Median (range)
PTV (cc) Mean lung dose (Gy) Lung V20 (%) Mean cardiac dose (Gy) Mean esophageal dose (Gy) Spinal cord maximum (Gy)
3D-ENI 406 (64–628) 16.6 (9.8–22.9) 29 (15–48) 16.2 (3.8–39.9) * NA 47.2 (19.2–58.2)
3D-IFRT 433 (137–1405) 15.1 (8.1–22.7) 26 (13–47) 13.4 (0.7–36.3) 27.7 (3.4–53.5) 43.9 (15.0–48.6)
IMRT 515 (170–1182) 16.5 (5.6–20.7) 30 (13–38) 8.6 (0.16–32.3) 26.1 (6.1–51.3) 43.2 (13.3–50.7)
*

Insufficient patients treated with 3D-ENI had available esophageal dose metrics for analysis

Abbreviations: ENI = elective nodal irradiation; IFRT = involved field radiotherapy; IMRT = intensity-modulated radiation therapy; PTV: Planning target volume; V20: percent receiving 20 Gy