Skip to main content
editorial
. 2016 Jan 6;5(1):6–19. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v5.i1.6

Table 2.

Summary of studies correlating the Oxford classification for immunoglobulin a nephropathy with clinical outcomes

Study Patients (n) End point Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Coppo et al[19] 206 A, 59 C Rate of eGFR decline M, E, S T M, E, S, T
Herzenberg et al[20] 143 A, 44 C Rate of eGFR decline Not done E, S, T
Katafuchi et al[21] 702 A, C ESRD Not done S, T
Zeng et al[22] 1026 A Rate of eGFR decline M, S, T M, T
Shi et al[23] 410 A ESRD M, S, T S, T
Edström Halling et al[24] 99 C GFR reduction > 50%, ESRD M, E, T E
Shima et al[25] 161 C eGFR < 60% mL/min per 1.73m2 M, T M, T
Coppo et al[26] 973 A, 174 C Rate of eGFR decline M, E, S, T S, T
Alamartine et al[27] 183 A Doubling of SCr or ESRD E, S, T None
El Karoui et al[28] 128 A Rate of eGFR decline Not done T
Lee et al[29] 69 A GFR reduction > 50%, ESRD E, T E
Kang et al[30] 197 A GFR reduction > 50%, ESRD T T
Le et al[31] 218 C eGFR reduction > 50%, ESRD T, S T

A: Adults; C: Children; eGFR: Estimated glomerular filtration rate; E: Endothelial hypercellularity; ESRD: End-stage renal disease; GFR: Glomerular filtration rate; M: Mesangial hypercellularity; S: Segmental sclerosis; Scr: Serum creatinine; T: Tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis.