Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 6;12(113):20150830. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0830

Table 2.

Morphometric data (mean ± s.d.) reconstructed from µCT images. Inline graphic sum of vessel length of the entire coronary arterial trees (down to the terminal vessels reconstructed from µCT images) in a mouse; Inline graphic sum of intravascular volume of the entire coronary arterial trees in a mouse; Inline graphic CSA averaged over all vessels of an entire coronary arterial tree; BW, body weight; stem–crown number, the total number of stem–crown units in an entire coronary arterial tree; mean ± s.d., the Inline graphic and BW were averaged over mice in each age group; the Inline graphic and stem–crown number were averaged over all coronary arterial trees in each age group.

morphometry of coronary arteries Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic BW (g) stem–crown number
one week 3.32 ± 1.20 5.31 ± 3.08 7.35 ± 1.56 9.8 ± 0.4 9 ± 5
three weeks 7.06 ± 3.74 12.3 ± 5.57 8.02 ± 1.78 11.0 ± 0.8 23 ± 18
six weeks 16.8 ± 6.13 18.1 ± 5.31 6.05 ± 1.02 17.4 ± 1.5 69 ± 50
12 weeks 17.5 ± 5.12 29.3 ± 6.24 7.81 ± 1.24 37.6 ± 3.9 61 ± 48
five to six months 14.4 ± 5.80 23.6 ± 6.55 7.19 ± 1.59 36.1 ± 4.1 44 ± 26
more than eight months 9.96 ± 3.96 11.2 ± 5.19 6.22 ± 1.11 38.1 ± 4.8 36 ± 27
statistical difference (p < 0.05) 1 w versus 6 w
1 w versus 12 w
1 w versus 5–6 m
1 w versus >8 m
3 w versus 6 w
3 w versus 12 w
3 w versus 5–6 m
6 w versus >8 m
12 w versus >8 m
1 w versus 6 w
1 w versus 12 w
1 w versus 5–6 m
3 w versus 12 w
3 w versus 5–6 m
6 w versus 12 w
6 w versus >8 m
12 w versus >8 m
5–6 m versus >8 m
1 w versus 6 w
3 w versus 6 w
3 w versus >8 m
6 w versus 12 w
6 w versus 5–6 m
12 w versus >8 m
1 w versus 6 w
1 w versus 12 w
1 w versus 5–6 m
1 w versus >8 m
3 w versus 6 w
3 w versus 12 w
3 w versus 5–6 m
3 w versus >8 m
6 w versus 12 w
6 w versus 5–6 m
6 w versus >8 m
1 w versus 6 w
1 w versus 12 w
1 w versus 5–6 m
3 w versus 6 w
3 w versus 12 w
6 w versus >8 m