Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 17.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2015 Jun 3;137(23):7302–7305. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b04425

Table 1.

Development of an Enantioselective CO2-Capture Reaction using a Homoallylic Alcohol

graphic file with name nihms749146t1.jpg

entry ligand (base) acida notesb yieldc ee
(%)d
1 none 0%
2 none NaHe 16%
3 none NaH (THF)e 25%
4 DMAP (5)f trace
5 DBU (6)f trace
6 TBD (4)f 11%
7 TFAf 6%
8 3f 4%
9 PBAM (7) 18% 39
10 StilbPBAM (8) 33% 36
11 8 MS 35% 60
12 8 HOTf MS 62% 74
13 8 H2NTf MS 52% 62
14 8 F6C3(SO2)2NH MS 70% 86
15 8g HNTf2 MS, 0.4 M 95% 91
16 8 HNTf2 MS, 0.2 M 51% 89
17 8 HNTf2 MS, 0.1 M 10% 79
18 5f trace
19 4f MS 30%
20 6f MS 13%
21 6f ½ HNTf2 MS 4%
a

Catalyst prepared as the 1:1 acid salt, except entry 21.

b

MS denotes molecular sieves 4A, employed at a concentration of 1 g/mmol relative to the alcohol.

c

Isolated yield.

d

Enantiomeric excess (ee) determined by HPLC using a chiral stationary phase. Reactions are 0.4 M toluene unless otherwise noted.

e

Reaction temp = 0 °C. 3-Methyl-3-buten-1-ol was converted in 60% yield under identical conditions.

f

20 mol % catalyst employed.

g

5 mol % catalyst employed, with results analogous to those using 10 mol % catalyst.

g