Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 6;9:171–181. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S91848

Table 3.

Meta-analysis of FGFR1 and prognosis in NSCLC patients

Categories Study population (reference) Meta-analysis model HR (95% CI) I2 (%) Ph P-value
Overall survival
Overall 13 (7–10,15–17,20–23,26,28) Fixed 1.30 (1.13–1.50) 3.8 0.409 <0.001
NSCLC only 7 (8,9,15–17,21,28) Fixed 1.25 (1.03–1.51) 39.4 0.129 0.024
SCC only 7 (7,8,10,16,20,22,26) Fixed 1.31 (1.06–1.61) 0 0.802 0.012
Asian 2 (18,28) Fixed 1.76 (1.16–2.66) 0 0.695 0.008
Non-Asian 11 (7–10,15–17,20,22,23,26) Fixed 1.25 (1.07–1.45) 0 0.44 0.005
FISH analysis 9 (7,8,15–17,20,22,23,28) Fixed 1.37 (1.16–1.61) 0 0.621 <0.001
qPCR analysis 2 (9,10) Fixed 1.04 (0.75–1.44) 0 0.439 0.621
Large study (n.300) Fixed 1.27 (1.01–1.60) 0 0.052 0.042
Disease-free survival
Overall 4 (7,8,20,28) Random 1.43 (0.96–2.12) 54.3 0.087 0.075
NSCLC only 1 (8) 1.46 (0.76–2.81) .0.05
SCC only 4 (7,8,16,28) Random 1.37 (0.89–2.09) 56.5 0.075 0.152

Note: P-value for heterogeneity, based on Q-test.

Abbreviations: NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; qPCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction.