Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb;4(1):41–50. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2015.01.07

Table 2. The subjective and objective outcomes following non-transecting bulbar urethroplasty techniques.

Variables Clinical assessment (patient satisfied with surgical outcome) (n, %) Mean Qmax (mL/s) after surgery Urethrogram (no evidence of stricture recurrence) (n, %)
Stricturoplasty (n=6) 5 (83.3) 25.1 5 (83.3)
NTABU* (n=43) 41 (95.3) 35 42 (97.7)
ANTABU** (n=16) 14 (87.5) 25.7 16 (100.0)

, 50% reduction in urethral calibre in one other patient but good flow and happy with outcome at 25.1 month follow-up; *, non-transecting anastomotic bulbar urethroplasty; **, augmented non-transecting anastomotic bulbar urethroplasty.