Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2015 Oct 23;17(1):76–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.09.013

Table 2.

Acceptability of CBPT and Education programs to study participants (N=84).

Measure CBPT (N=42) Education (N=42)
1. Helpful (0–10), mean (SD) 8.9 (1.7) 8.1 (2.1)
2. Likely to recommend (0–10), mean (SD)* 9.3 (1.6) 8.3 (2.7)
3. Overall benefit, taking into account the effort put into it, N (%)
 Benefits far outweighed the effort 25 (59.5) 19 (45.2)
 Benefits somewhat outweighed the effort 5 (11.9) 4 (9.5)
 Benefits equaled the effort 11 (26.2) 14 (33.3)
 Effort somewhat outweighed the benefits 1 (2.4) 2 (4.8)
 Effort far outweighed the benefits 0 (0) 3 (7.2)
4. Importance of changes in pain, N (%)*
 Pain decreased a meaningful amount 23 (54.8) 9 (21.4)
There  Some decrease in pain, but not enough to be meaningful 6 (14.3) 6 (14.3)
 No change in pain 13 (30.9) 27 (64.3)
 Some increase in pain, but not enough to be meaningful 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Pain increased a meaningful amount 0 (0) 0 (0)
5. Importance of changes in activity, N (%)*
 Activity increased a meaningful amount 32 (76.2) 14 (33.3)
There  Some increase in activity, but not enough to be meaningful 4 (9.5) 7 (16.7)
 No change in activity 6 (14.3) 20 (47.6)
 Some decrease in activity, but not enough to be meaningful 0 (0) 1 (2.4)
 Activity decreased a meaningful amount 0 (0) 0 (0)
6. Compared to other services, the importance of the program to recovery, N (%)
 Much more important 12 (28.5) 6 (14.3)
 Somewhat more important 7 (16.7) 10 (23.8)
 As important 21 (50) 17 (40.5)
 Somewhat less important 1 (2.4) 5 (11.9)
 Much less important 1 (2.4) 4 (9.5)
*

p < 0.05 for significant differences across groups;

SD = standard deviation