Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 24;14(1):152–167. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.020

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The E-cadherin-GFP Mouse as a Tool to Monitor the Early Anti-invasive Drug Response

(A) Schematic of anti-invasive dasatinib treatment using KrasG12D; p53R172H; E-cadherin-GFP mice.

(B) Representative images from confocal FRAP movies of dasatinib-treated KrasG12D; p53R172H; E-cadherin-GFP mouse (oral gavage, 3× daily, 10 mg/kg). Red arrows, bleached regions.

(C and D) Graphs comparing E-cadherin-GFP mobilization in in situ pancreatic tissue of control (orange) and dasatinib-treated (pink) KrasG12D; p53R172H; E-cadherin-GFP mice. Columns, mean; bars, ± SE; n = 3 mice/group, ≥21 junctions in total. ∗∗p < 0.01 (unpaired Student’s t test).

(E and F) TEER (E) and Dispase assays (F) in E-cadherin-GFP-transfected p53−/− PDAC cells (columns 1 and 3, pre-dasatinib; columns 5 and 7, post-dasatinib) versus mutant p53 PDAC cells (columns 2 and 4, pre-dasatinib; columns 6 and 8, post-dasatinib). Columns, mean; bars, ± SE; n = 3 mice/group. p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01 (unpaired Student’s t test).

See also Figure S4.