Table 3.

Contrast analysis as a function of stimulus content (human—H, nature—N) and stimulus dynamism (dynamic—D, static—S) during AESTHETIC judgment task.

Contrast	Brain structure	Side	KE	p. FWE corr cluster level	Z	Local maxima (MNI)
						x	y	z
N vs. H	Lingual gyrus	R/L	1300	0.000	Inf	12	−86	−8
					Inf	−8	−72	−4
	Mid/Sup occipital cortex	R/L			7.20	30	−82	20
					7.33	−12	−90	6
	Superior parietal lobe	R/L			6.16	24	−66	54
					4.95	−16	−70	50
	Central insula	R	284	0.009	5.01	46	8	2
H vs. N	Inf/Mid temp sulcus—EBA	R	3768	0.000	Inf	52	−72	4
	Fusiform				7.16	42	−44	−24
	Inf/Mid temp sulcus—EBA	L	2214	0.000	Inf	−44	−84	−2
	Fusiform				6.35	−40	−46	−26
	Precuneus	R	416	0.001	4.85	4	−62	36
D vs. S	Middle temporal sulcus	L	272	0.011	4.04	−36	−80	6
S vs. D	Cen/Post insula	L	747	0.000	4.34	−44	−16	16
					4.68	−38	6	0
	Cen/Post insula	R	711	0.000	4.28	56	0	6
					4.22	40	12	−4
Content*Dynamism	Postcentral gyrus	L	831	0.000	4.18	−30	−30	70
	Superior parietal lobule	L			4.00	−28	−50	62
	Occipital/Calcarine cortex	R	185	0.000	3.88	14	−100	4
NS vs. ND	Cen/Post insula	L	804	0.000	4.34	−42	−14	16
					4.07	−36	−20	4
HD vs. HS	Posterior temporal cortex	L	729	0.000	4.47	−38	−82	6
	Posterior temporal cortex	R	452	0.000	5.39	52	−58	−6
	Posterior parietal cortex	L	518	0.001	4.49	−30	−54	64

The results are thresholded at p < 0.05 FWE corrected at the cluster level.

^“*”Stems for “interaction.”