Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 29;2016:9201492. doi: 10.1155/2016/9201492

Table 3.

Characteristics of studies that compared ACI with MACT.

Study Year Study design Regions Number of patients FU Age
Mean, range (yr)
Gender
Male/female
Locations Major assessments of efficacy Excellent Good Fair Poor Graft hypertrophy Frequency of reoperation Other assessments
Bartlett et al. [21] 2005 RCT England ACI-C: 44
MACT: 47
1 yr 33.7, 15–49
33.4, 17–47
54/37 Knee MCS 10
15
16
19
10
7
8
6
4/44
3/47
4/44
4/47
ICRS, biopsy

Manfredini et al. [34] 2007 CCS Italy ACI-C: 17
MACT: 15
Mean, 48.5 mo. 32.3, 17–51
35.2, 20–55
15/2
13/2
Knee HSS 9
6
6
3
2
1
0
0
NR
NR
NR
NR
ICRS, MRI, and biopsy

Ferruzzi et al. [35] 2008 CCS Italy ACI-P: 48
MACT: 50
5 yr 32.3
35.2
30/18
36/14
Knee IKDC 7
7
10
23
23
11
8
9
4/48
2/50
6/48
2/50
MRI, biopsy

Zeifang et al. [20] 2010 RCT Germany ACI-P: 10
MACT: 11
2 yr 29.5
29.1
16/5 Femoral condyle IKDC NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
7/9
1/8
1/10
3/11
Lysholm, SF-36, TAS, and MOCART

Macmull et al. [36] 2012 CCS England ACI-C: 25
MACT: 23
Mean, 40.3 mo. 34.6, 17–50
35, 21–46
16/9
14/9
Patellae MCS 4
6
6
7
6
8
9
2
NR
NR
NR
NR
VAS, Bentley score

Panagopoulos et al. [37] 2012 CCS England ACI-P: 11
MACT: 8
Mean, 37.5 mo. 32.2, 18–43 8/3
7/1
Knee Lysholm 0
0
2
1
4
6
5
1
3/11
2/8
NR
NR
IKDC, TAS

FU: follow-up; RCT: randomized controlled trial; CCS: case-control study; ACI-C: autologous chondrocyte implantation with a flap made of collagen; ACI-P: autologous chondrocyte implantation with periosteal flap MACT: matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation; MCS: Modified Cincinnati Rating System; ICRS: International Cartilage Repair score; HSS: Hospital for Special Surgery score; IKDC: International Knee Documentation Committee; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; SF-36: Short-Form-36 Health Survey; MOCART: Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair; VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; TAS: Tegner Activity Score.