Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Dev Psychol. 2016 January-February;42:21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2015.11.002

Table 3.

Ethnic Identity as a Predictor of Latino Child Functioning at Home, Moderated by Gender and Ethnicity

Adaptive Behavior Externalizing Behavior Internalizing Behavior

B (SE) B(SE) B(SE)
Ethnic Identity
Constancy 3.04 (1.17)** −0.79 (0.74) 0.76 (0.96)
Knowledge 2.58 (1.35)* −0.71 (0.85) 0.18 (1.11)
Preference −0.41 (1.31) 0.31 (0.82) 0.09 (1.07)
F = 9.32; R2 = .11*** F = 1.23; R2 =.02 F =0.64; R2 =.01

Gender * Ethnic Identity
Constancy −1.08 (2.32) 1.41 (1.47) 0.04 (1.91)
Knowledge 3.56 (2.72) −1.94 (1.72) −1.80 (2.24)
Preference −3.25 (2.59) −1.40 (1.64) −2.72 (2.13)
F = 6.67***; ΔR2 = .01 F = 1.30; ΔR2 =.01 F =0.65; ΔR2 =.01

Ethnicity * Ethnic Identity
Constancy 3.68 (2.37) 1.12 (1.49) 1.89 (1.93)
Knowledge 0.62 (2.74) 1.32 (1.72) 1.49 (2.23)
Preference −0.01 (2.83) 2.17 (1.78) 2.34 (2.31)
F = 6.84***; ΔR2 = .02** F = 1.19; ΔR2 =.01 F =0.71; ΔR2 =.01

Note. Child functioning based on the Behavior Assessment System for Children-2 Parent Rating Scale. Degrees of freedom for Step 1 F statistic is (3, 539), for Step 2 is (4, 538), for Step 3 is (7, 535), and for Step 4 is (11, 531).

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.