Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 21;41(1):117–127. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv016

Table I.

A Comparison of Three Methods: Survey, Experience Sampling, and the EAR

Method aspect Survey Experience sampling EAR
Approach Efficiency oriented Ecologically oriented Ecologically oriented
Medium Paper and pencil, electronic Paper and pencil, electronic Electronic
Mode Active (data provided through voluntary response) Active (data provided through voluntary response) Passive (data collected through automatic recording)
Method Global self-report Momentary self-report Behavioral observation
Perspective Self (agent) Self (agent) Other (observer)
Awareness of assessment High High Low after habituation
Burden for participant Practical (time to participate) Practical (interruption of daily life) Psychological (intrusion of privacy)
Burden for researcher Minimal Preparing participants (instruction and training) Preparing the sound data (coding and transcribing)
Data collection limited by Retrospection, impression management, self-insight Response burden, impression management, self-insight Privacy considerations, self-censoring, laboratory capacity for data coding
Optimized for assessment of Subjective beliefs and personal self-concept Subjective experiences and perceptions Objective social environments and interactions
Child-friendliness Challenging for some children, depending on age and abilities Challenging for some children, depending on age and abilities Young children and children with cognitive/language limitations can wear the EAR