Table 4.
CURE students | Traditional students | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Welch df | t | p | d | Possible range of scores | |
Collaboration scale | 21.11 | 3.20 | 20.87 | 4.02 | 128.06 | 0.40 | >0.05 | 0.07 | 6–24 |
Discovery scale | 24.35 | 4.04 | 20.77 | 5.82 | 104.37 | 3.64 | <0.001 | 0.71 | 5–30 |
Iteration scale | 28.71 | 4.15 | 26.53 | 7.00 | 95.91 | 2.47 | <0.05 | 0.39 | 6–36 |
LCAS total score | 75.10 | 8.67 | 68.15 | 14.76 | 85.70 | 3.05 | <0.01 | 0.13 | 17–90 |
aOnly student responses with complete cases on each scale were used. LCAS total score n = 115 (60 CURE students, 55 traditional lab course students). Collaboration n = 141 (73 CURE students, 68 traditional lab course students). Discovery and relevance n = 133 (72 CURE students, 61 traditional lab course students). Iteration n = 134 (72 CURE students, 62 traditional lab course students). Welch’s df adjustment was made because the assumption of homogeneity of variance was not met.