Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 1;14(4):ar40. doi: 10.1187/cbe.15-02-0043

Table 6.

Participants' science motivation and program perceptionsa

Mean (SD) % Students agree/strongly agree
Science motivation post–Summer minicourse
 Interest 4.51 (0.52) 91.9
 Self-efficacy 3.94 (0.61) 54.3
 Mastery-approach goals 4.45 (0.43) 93.0
 Performance-approach goals 3.03 (0.91) 21.5
Science motivation at follow-up (Sophomore)
 Interest 4.34 (0.62) 87.9
 Self-efficacy 3.89 (0.68) 60.6
 Mastery-approach goals 4.27 (0.56) 83.4
 Performance-approach goals 2.89 (0.92) 23.8
Summer minicourse program assessment
 Connection to real life 4.08 (0.73) 72.1
 Autonomy support 3.98 (0.69) 58.6
 Opportunities for involvement 3.98 (0.52) 61.3
 Feelings of belonging in program 7.72 (1.53) 75.4
 Instructor is personable 4.15 (0.64) 65.1
 Perceived mastery goal structure 4.22 (0.55) 71.9
 Perceived performance goal structure 2.06 (0.75) 1.1
Fall research course assessment
 Connection to real life 4.01 (0.64) 69.3
 Autonomy support 4.25 (0.53) 74.4
 Opportunities for involvement 4.62 (0.55) 87.3
 Feelings of belonging in program 8.62 (1.06) 95.5
 Instructor is personable 4.46 (0.54) 84.8
 Perceived mastery goal structure 4.18 (0.53) 69.6
 Perceived performance goal structure 2.16 (0.75) 3.8

aValues reflect ratings from students in cohorts 1–3 of the program. All constructs measured on a five-point scale; “Feelings of belonging in program” measured on a 10-point scale. Higher scores indicate greater levels of endorsement. “% Students agree/strongly agree” represents students who responded with a 4 or 5 for all scales except for “Feelings of belonging in program” (represents students responding 7 or above). Fall research course assessment consists of responses from students in Fall research course only.