Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2015 Jan 8;109:12–26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.075

Table 1.

Behavioral results. Left: percentage of counterfactual modifications of “choice”, “situation” and “other” during post-scan interview (N = 17). Right: Mean ratings collected online in the scanner (N = 26). Numbers in parenthesis indicate standard deviations.

Condition Modification Rating
Choice Situation Other Could Should Would
Self 93.49% 6.23% 0.28% 4.75 (0.29) 4.22 (0.70) 3.19 (0.85)
Fam_Sim 83.12% 15.76% 0.98% 4.49 (0.46) 3.85 (0.68) 3.45 (0.65)
Unf_Sim 82.07% 17.23% 0.70% 4.50 (0.47) 3.95 (0.67) 3.56 (0.49)
Unf_Dis 76.54% 21.71% 1.75% 4.28 (0.63) 3.65 (0.82) 3.28 (0.58)
Object 0.07% 96.29% 3.54% 4.04 (0.65) 2.57 (0.65) 2.62 (0.71)