Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 12.
Published in final edited form as: Prev Sci. 2014 Aug;15(4):473–484. doi: 10.1007/s11121-013-0400-z

Table 2.

Predictive Effects of Parenting Practices, Family Processes, Neighborhood Social Processes, and Neighborhood Conditions on Physical Fighting

Initial Models1
  Parameter Adjusted1
OR (95% CI) p
Broken windows score 1.02 (0.97, 1.06) 0.5266
Family communication 0.77 (0.65, 0.90) 0.0012
Relationship with mother 0.71 (0.58, 0.87) 0.0012
Relationship with father 0.67 (0.56, 0.80) <.0001
Parental monitoring 0.55 (0.44, 0.68) <.0001
Informal social control 0.80 (0.71, 0.92) 0.0010
Sense of community 0.87 (0.74, 1.01) 0.0683
Neighborhood support
 Two parent household 1.04 (0.87, 1..25) 0.6665
 One parent household 0.65 (0.49, 0.85) 0.0017
 Inconsistent 1.08 (0.81, 1.45) 0.6028
Neighborhood concerns – crime/safety 1.08 (0.98, 1.20) 0.1257
Neighborhood concerns – services 1.09 (0.99, 1.20) 0.0876
Final Model2
  Parameter Adjusted2
OR (95% CI) P
Relationship with father 0.68 (0.57, 0.83) <.0001
Parental monitoring 0.58 (0.46, 0.72) <.0001
Informal social control 0.83 (0.72, 0.96) 0.0142
Neighborhood support
 Two parent household 1.10 (0.91, 1.34) 0.3304
 One parent household 0.73 (0.54, 1.00) 0.0484
 Inconsistent 1.17 (0.85, 1.60) 0.3385
1

Ten separate initial models were analyzed (one for each variable of interest). Each was adjusted for the potential confounders youth age, gender, race/ethnicity, family structure, ever below the federal poverty level, parental education, neighborhood structural disadvantage, and neighborhood residential instability. ORs for the potential confounding variables are not shown.

2

One final model was analyzed that adjusted for the potential confounders above and also adjusted for other variables of interest in the final model. Only variables of interest with a p-value ≤ .05 were retained in the final model. ORs for the potential confounding variables are not shown.