Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 5;124(1):141–150. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409546

Table 2.

Particle constituent concentrations and correlations between the elemental and total mass concentrations.

Exposure PM2.5 PM10
na Mean ± SD rb n Mean ± SD rb
Mass concentration (μg/m3) 33,882 17.0 ± 4.7 33,882 26.9 ± 7.8
Elemental concentration (ng/m3)
Copper (Cu) 34,923 3.4 ± 2.1 0.43 34,923 14.0 ± 10.6 0.54
Iron (Fe) 34,290 104.0 ± 57.4 0.17 34,923 435.3 ± 276.0 0.59
Potassium (K) 34,096 116.7 ± 27.4 0.20 34,290 224.3 ± 72.2 0.31
Nickel (Ni) 30,430 1.6 ± 0.8 0.67 34,923 1.8 ± 1.2 0.71
Sulfur (S) 34,290 753.9 ± 129.5 0.84 34,290 858.1 ± 171.7 0.84
Silicon (Si) 34,923 83.1 ± 54.4 0.02 34,923 489.7 ± 338.1 0.27
Vanadium (V) 34,923 2.8 ± 1.2 0.62 34,923 3.4 ± 1.5 0.66
Zinc (Zn) 34,290 14.8 ± 4.9 0.60 34,923 25.1 ± 10.9 0.61
aThe numbers of participants are smaller for particle mass concentrations than for elemental concentrations because particle mass concentrations are pregnancy averages, and in some cases the routine monitoring data used to back-extrapolate particle mass concentrations were missing. Particle constituents are annual averages, and the numbers differ among particle constituents because we could not estimate all exposures in each study area. bAll Pearson correlations had a p-value < 0.001.