Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 24;5(12):e008130. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008130

Table 5.

Associations between hospital episodes and primary care factors: population-attributable fractions

Unadjusted PAF (95% CI)* p Value Adjusted PAF (95% CI)† p Value
Patient population factors
 IMD 0.089 (0.073 to 0.106) 4.9×10−24 0.084 (0.067 to 0.100) 7.3×10−22
 Patient ethnicity (% white) 0.009 (−0.009 to 0.027) 0.32 −0.004 (−0.032 to 0.023) 0.78
 Practice morbidity index (registrations/1000 patients) 0.041 (0.024 to 0.059) 5.8×10−6 0.175 (−0.053 to 0.354) 0.12
Practice factors
 GP supply (FTE/1000 patients) −0.014 (−0.033 to 0.004) 0.13 0.016 (−0.026 to0.005) 0.0046
 Handedness of practice 0.001 (−0.002 to 0.003) 0.64 0.001 (−0.002 to 0.005) 0.44
 GPs >50 years (%) −0.041 (−0.089 to 0.005) 0.082 −0.023 (−0.072 to 0.024) 0.35
 GPs with non-UK qualifications (%) −0.007 (−0.029 to 0.014) 0.51 0.035 (−0.058 to0.012) 0.0025
 Female GPs (%) 0.022 (−0.032 to 0.073) 0.42 0.049 (−0.024 to 0.117) 0.19
QOF indicator achievement (%)
 Total QOF points −0.002 (−0.018 to 0.013) 0.78 0.021 (−0.042 to 0.000) 0.045
 PE07 0.041 (−0.012 to 0.092) 0.12 0.008 (−0.055 to 0.067) 0.80
 PE08 0.062 (0.003 to 0.118) 0.04 0.031 (−0.039 to 0.096) 0.37
 CHD06 −0.006 (−0.094 to 0.074) 0.88 −0.072 (−0.208 to 0.049) 0.26
 CHD08 −0.033 (−0.171 to 0.088) 0.61 −0.135 (−0.317 to 0.021) 0.094
 STROKE06 0.058 (−0.008 to 0.120) 0.086 0.076 (−0.008 to 0.153) 0.075
 STROKE08 0.039 (−0.064 to 0.132) 0.44 0.031 (−0.088 to 0.137) 0.59
 DM17 0.125 (−0.007 to 0.240) 0.063 0.128 (−0.023 to 0.257) 0.092
 DM26 0.370 (0.222 to 0.490) 1.8×10−5 0.372 (0.218 to 0.496) 3.1×10−5
 DM30 −0.031 (−0.120 to 0.050) 0.46 0.144 (−0.280 to0.022) 0.02
 BP05 0.073 (−0.086 to 0.208) 0.35 0.138 (−0.069 to 0.304) 0.18
 MED12 0.001 (−0.002 to 0.004) 0.55 0.000 (−0.003 to 0.003) 0.98
 RECORD09 0.005 (0.000 to 0.009) 0.048 0.005 (−0.000 to 0.009) 0.053

Bold typeface denotes p<0.05. Unadjusted and adjusted PAFs associated with each primary care factor are displayed. Each fraction refers to the difference between the baseline scenario in table 1, and the sample scenario.

*Adjusted for practice, patient population age and sex.

†Adjusted for patient population age, sex, ethnicity, morbidity score and IMD, GP age, sex and country of qualification, and practice list size, handedness and QOF achievement on the indicators listed.

FTE, full-time equivalent; GP, general practitioner; IMD, Index of Multiple Deprivation; PAF, population attributable fraction; QOF, Quality and Outcomes Framework.