Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 30;5(12):e009700. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009700

Table 5.

Ordered logistic regression results examining demographic, facility, visit, and perceived quality of care as predictors of overall patient satisfaction

Non-HIV services
HIV services
All patients
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
Perceived quality (% very good/excellent)
 Health personnel practices and conduct 3.53*** (2.34 to 5.33) 11.00*** (3.97 to 30.51) 4.08*** (2.64 to 6.30)
 Adequacy of resources and services 1.66* (1.08 to 2.55) 4.68** (1.81 to 12.10) 2.15*** (1.48 to 3.11)
 Healthcare delivery 1.75* (1.13 to 2.70) 1.02 (0.47 to 2.24) 1.68* (1.06 to 2.67)
 Accessibility of care 2.49*** (1.64 to 3.76) 1.24 (0.46 to 3.37) 2.08*** (1.45 to 2.98)
 Cost of care 1.42 (0.94 to 2.16) 1.05 (0.27 to 4.15) 1.17 (0.78 to 1.77)
Facility characteristics
 MOH managed (ref: private/NGO) 0.41*** (0.27 to 0.64) 0.77 (0.45 to 1.33) 0.6 (0.29 to 1.24)
 Rural (ref: urban) 0.69* (0.48 to 0.99) 0.26*** (0.16 to 0.41) 0.47*** (0.32 to 0.69)
 Hospital (ref: health centre or post) 1.78*** (1.27 to 2.48) 0.93 (0.63 to 1.39) 1.3 (0.88 to 1.93)
Patient characteristics
 Age 1 (0.99 to 1.00) 1 (0.97 to 1.02) 1 (0.99 to 1.00)
 Male respondent 1.19 (0.98 to 1.45) 1.12 (0.63 to 1.99) 1.22* (1.01 to 1.47)
 Education of respondent (ref: none)
  Primary 0.82 (0.58 to 1.14) 1.33 (0.46 to 3.85) 0.89 (0.66 to 1.19)
  Post-primary 0.66* (0.46 to 0.96) 1.31 (0.42 to 4.09) 0.75 (0.53 to 1.05)
 Self-rated very good or excellent health 1.29* (1.01 to 1.66) 2.68** (1.35 to 5.30) 1.34** (1.11 to 1.62)
 Ethnicity (ref: other)
  Tonga 0.81 (0.65 to 1.02) 0.583* (0.37 to 0.93) 0.84 (0.69 to 1.03)
  Chewa Nyanja 0.85 (0.62 to 1.16) 0.8 (0.47 to 1.35) 1.06 (0.84 to 1.33)
 Patient respondent (ref: attendant) 0.89 (0.70 to 1.13) 2.21 (0.98 to 5.01) 0.93 (0.73 to 1.18)
Visit characteristics
 Travelled an hour or more 0.96 (0.77 to 1.21) 0.83 (0.48 to 1.44) 0.89 (0.72 to 1.10)
 Waited an hour or more 1.12 (0.89 to 1.41) 0.68 (0.41 to 1.14) 0.96 (0.79 to 1.16)
 Saw doctor or CO (ref: nurse/other) 0.86 (0.62 to 1.19) 1.3 (0.57 to 2.96) 0.9 (0.61 to 1.32)
N 1927 398 2325

The exponentiated coefficients shown here can be interpreted as the OR of giving a higher overall rating, for a one-unit increase in the predictor variable.

*p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001.

CO, clinical officer; MOH, Ministry of Health, Zambian government; NGO, non-governmental organisation.