Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 30;2016:4743808. doi: 10.1155/2016/4743808

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis for the association between elevated preoperative NLR and prognosis of HCC patients treated with LT.

Study endpoints Variables Number of studies Number of patients HR (95% CI) P value Heterogeneity
I 2 (%) P value
OS Total 7 1292 2.71 (1.91–3.83) 0.000 65.6 0.008
NLR range
 3.0–4.0 3 539 2.17 (1.41–3.34) 0.000 71.6 0.030
 5.0–6.0 4 753 3.43 (2.14–5.49) 0.000 40.7 0.168
LT types
 LDLT 3 532 3.79 (2.57–5.60) 0.000 0.0 0.491
 DDLT 3 480 2.50 (1.43–4.37) 0.001 71.1 0.031
 Mixed 1 280 1.70 (1.17–2.48) 0.006

DFS Total 10 1687 3.61 (2.23–5.84) 0.000 85.7 0.000
NLR range
 3.0–4.0 6 934 2.36 (1.54–3.60) 0.000 79.0 0.000
 5.0–6.0 4 753 7.13 (3.16–16.07) 0.000 64.9 0.036
LT types
 LDLT 6 927 3.38 (1.65–6.94) 0.001 84.0 0.000
 DDLT 3 480 6.19 (1.70–22.56) 0.006 89.2 0.000
 Mixed 1 280 1.76 (1.22–2.53) 0.002

NLR, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LT, liver transplantation; OS, overallsurvival; DFS, disease-free survival; LDLT, living donor liver transplantation; DDLT, deceased donor living transplantation; HR, hazard ratio; and CI, confidence interval.