Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 30;2015:861849. doi: 10.1155/2015/861849

Table 1.

The characteristics of included studies in this systematic review.

Author, year Method Participants total (T/C) Mean (SD)/range age Intervention Acupuncture points Frequency and duration of acupuncture intervention Outcomes
Treatment Control Treatment Control
Fink et al., 2002 [20] RCT 45 (23/22) 52.5 ± 8.7 51.6 ± 10.0 Real acupuncture Sham acupuncture Ashi, LI10, LI11, LU5, LI4, and SJ5 25 min/treatment; 10 treatments, with 2 treatments per week (1) Maximal muscle strength
(2) VAS
(3) DASH

Irnich et al., 2003 [21] RCT 50 (25/25) 31–70 38–65 Real acupuncture Sham acupuncture LI4, LI10, SI3, SJ5, and GB34 25 min/treatment; 3 treatments within 10 days (1) PPT
(2) GS
(3) IP

Jiang et al., 2005 [22] RCT 128 (64/64) 42.14 ± 5.62 41.68 ± 5.76 Electroacupuncture plus moxibustion with material insulation Blockage therapy LI4, LR3 20 min/treatment; 10 treatments within 5 treatments per week Elbow function status

Li et al., 2014 [23] RCT 86 (43/43) 18–22 18–22 Electroacupuncture plus massage and blockage therapy Blockage therapy Ashi, LI11, LI12, LI10, SJ5, and LI4 30 min/treatment; once per day for 10 days (1) VAS
(2) GSI
(3) MEPS

VAS: Visual Analog Scale; DASH: disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand; PPT: pressure pain threshold; GS: grip strength; IP: impairment caused by pain; GSI: grip strength index; MEPS: Mayo Elbow Performance Score.