Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 13;16:16. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0696-x

Table 5.

QTLs detected for 11 traits using the SNP linkage map across two low-N conditions

Trait QTL Chr Position (cM) Flanking marker Interval (cM)a LOD score Additiveb R2 (%)c
Chl-2 qChl2-1 1 211 S1_61786623 - S1_61836509 208.1–217.7 3.28 −1.26 8.69
qChl2-9b 9 136 S9_55230722 - S9_56646280 126.1–142.2 3.07 1.25 8.49
Chl-3 qChl3-1 1 157.8 S1_50614823 - S1_50837764 150.6–178.1 3.29 1.79 10.1
qChl3-7 7 87.7 S7_57772979 - S7_60426792 85.9–97.8 4.57 2.71 14.2
PH qPH-6 6 30.8 S6_41970042 - S6_43222258 28.9–34.8 5.30 −16.4 13.2
AD qAD-1 1 210.8 S1_61709596- S1_61786623 206.5–218.1 5.15 3.63 16.7
qAD-9a 9 159.4 S9_45363122 - S9_58417131 148.8–176 3.29 −3.00 16.4
MC1 qMC1-1 1 211 S1_61786623 - S1_61836509 208.1–217.7 3.14 1.44 10.0
qMC1-6b 6 54.6 S6_52982294 - S6_54274803 49.3–61.9 2.69 1.14 6.97
MC2 qMC2-1a 1 203 S1_55726325 - S1_57821154 201.3–220.9 4.74 4.74 16.4
qMC2-1b 1 209.4 S1_59080688- S1_59595161 198.2–219.4 8.10 4.44 20.3
BY qBY-5 5 20 S5_44956096 - S5_45759643 14.5–28.4 2.95 0.72 9.04
qBY-7 7 85.9 S7_57557894 - S7_57772979 79.3–95.1 3.86 −1.01 12.5
GY qGY-5 5 78.6 S5_59373257 - S5_59373316 75.3–82.2 3.22 0.37 10.8
qGY-6a 6 15.8 S6_3799293 - S6_8141493 12.7–17.8 3.06 −0.25 9.83
qGY-6b 6 22.3 S6_13884102 - S6_37768125 20.6–25.6 3.03 −0.38 11.0
qGY-6c 6 30.8 S6_41970042 - S6_43222258 28.9–34.8 2.73 −0.23 8.00
TW qTW-1 1 209.4 S1_59595161- S1_61709496 201.3–220.9 5.79 −1.79 17.9
GS qGS-1b 1 212.7 S1_61786623 - S1_61836509 204.1–219.7 4.67 −0.08 14.4
qGS-5 5 78.6 S5_59373257 - S5_59373316 76.2–80.1 5.30 0.07 14.6

Chlorophyll contents at vegetative stage (Chl1), at anthesis (Chl2), and at maturity (Chl3); PH, plant height (cm); AD, days to anthesis; MC1, % stover moisture content; MC2, % head moisture content; BY, biomass yield (t.ha−1); GY, grain yield (t.ha−1); TW, test weight (g); GS, grain/stover ratio (%). a2.0-LOD drop support interval of the QTL; bAdditive effect: positive values of the additive effect indicate that alleles from Ck60 were in the direction of increasing the trait score and vice versa; c Percentage of phenotypic variation explained by the QTL. The SNP underlined is the corresponding SNP of QTL