TABLE 5.
Comparison of mean FERMI values for LUKAS2 homes in which observations of visible mold or more generally moisture damage were made in the living room, the child's main living areas, or the whole housea
Area in home | Visible mold and FERMI |
Moisture damage and FERMI |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Detection | No. of homes | FERMIb | P value | Detection | No. of homes | FERMIb | P value | |
Living room | No | 141 | 5.33 | None | 128 | 4.98 | ||
Yes | 3 | 15.20 | 0.007 | Minor | 12 | 11.10 | ||
Major | 4 | 6.53 | 0.01 | |||||
Child's main living area | No | 134 | 4.92 | None | 102 | 4.85 | ||
Yes | 10 | 13.69 | <0.0001 | Minor | 31 | 6.30 | ||
Major | 11 | 9.70 | 0.04 | |||||
Whole house | No | 100 | 4.51 | Class 0/1 | 60 | 3.81 | ||
Yes | 44 | 7.85 | 0.003 | Class 2 | 50 | 5.91 | ||
Class ≥3 | 34 | 8.02 | 0.007 |
Differences in the mean FERMI values were evaluated by using a t test or one-way ANOVA.
Mean FERMI value.