Table 1.

Logistic regression analysis of past year drinking status (use vs. abstention) among individual survey respondents (n = 8,790)

Variable	b	z	p	Δχ2	Δdf	p	Δχ2/Δdf
City fixed effects	–	–	–	138.92	49	<.001	2.84
Gender (female)	-6.816	-10.353	<.001	47.21	1	<.001	47.21
Education	–	–	–	94.23	2	<.001	47.12
High school	0.642	8.647	<.001
College	0.782	9.159	<.001
Adults per household	-0.019	-0.822	n.s.	0.68	1	n.s.	0.68
Age groups, in years	–	–	–	111.16	7	<.001	15.88
20–24	0.831	6.779	<.001
25–29	0.384	3.059	.001
30–39	0.271	2.353	.009
40–49	0.414	3.599	<.001
50–59	0.201	1.621	n.s.
60–69	0.068	0.527	n.s.
≥70	-0.162	-1.273	n.s.
Household incomea	–	–	–	285.50	2	<.001	142.75
Linear	0.021	10.846	<.001
Quadratic	-0.001	-6.085	<.001
Race/ethnicity	–	–	–	127.91	4	<.001	31.97
Black	0.171	0.989	n.s.
White	0.626	4.557	<.001
Asian	-0.222	-1.433	n.s.
Hispanic	0.035	0.251	n.s.

Notes: McFadden Pseudo-R² = .1192; sensitivity = 72.84%; specificity = 57.48%. n.s. = not significant.

^aPer $1,000 increase.