Table 4.
Hierarchical Bayesian Poisson models for counts of alcohol outlets in census block groups (n = 8,877) nested in 50 cities, with random effects for cities
| Variable | Model 1b: All outlets IRR [95% CI] | Model 2b: Bars IRR [95% CI] | Model 3b: Restaurants IRR [95% CI] | Model 4b: Off premise IRR [95% CI] |
| Area (ln) | 1.495 [1.430, 1.561] | 1.443 [1.351, 1.540] | 1.538 [1.454, 1.631] | 1.358 [1.316, 1.402] |
| Incomea | ||||
| Local | 0.819 [0.799, 0.840] | 0.773 [0.737, 0.810] | 0.792 [0.768, 0.819] | 0.861 [0.843, 0.880] |
| Lagged | 0.833 [0.799, 0.867] | 0.804 [0.749, 0.865] | 0.807 [0.759, 0.853] | 0.892 [0.861, 0.923] |
| City | 1.360 [1.274, 1.452] | 1.422 [1.244, 1.670] | 1.493 [1.373, 1.629] | 1.238 [1.132, 1.348] |
| Population | ||||
| Localb | 2.281 [1.755, 2.962] | 1.257 [0.809, 1.928] | 2.145 [1.542, 2.986] | 2.124 [1.722, 2.633] |
| Laggedb | 1.508 [1.404, 1.616] | 1.306 [1.162, 1.476] | 1.670 [1.528, 1.827] | 1.344 [1.272, 1.420] |
| Cityc | 1.039 [1.001, 1.086] | 1.042 [0.967, 1.130] | 1.051 [1.006, 1.099] | 1.017 [0.971, 1.069] |
| Whited | ||||
| Local | 0.980 [0.933, 1.034] | 1.039 [0.958, 1.129] | 1.001 [0.934, 1.067] | 0.977 [0.937, 1.021] |
| Lagged | 1.077 [0.993, 1.157] | 1.221 [1.081, 1.378] | 1.035 [0.939, 1.152] | 1.097 [1.035, 1.161] |
| City | 0.962 [0.854, 1.053] | 0.893 [0.733, 1.127] | 0.915 [0.822, 1.039] | 1.026 [0.911, 1.159] |
| Blackd | ||||
| Local | 0.972 [0.909, 1.048] | 0.993 [0.876, 1.124] | 0.949 [0.858, 1.051] | 0.993 [0.935, 1.057] |
| Lagged | 0.821 [0.738, 0.906] | 0.838 [0.709, 0.995] | 0.673 [0.579, 0.775] | 0.913 [0.843, 0.985] |
| City | 1.111 [0.908, 1.324] | 1.306 [0.928, 1.931] | 1.098 [0.903, 1.360] | 1.177 [0.948, 1.453] |
| Hispanicd | ||||
| Local | 1.033 [0.990, 1.080] | 1.059 [0.988, 1.136] | 0.976 [0.922, 1.033] | 1.063 [1.025, 1.105] |
| Lagged | 0.915 [0.851, 0.981] | 1.057 [0.950, 1.170] | 0.835 [0.769, 0.916] | 0.985 [0.935, 1.036] |
| City | 1.049 [0.940, 1.147] | 0.948 [0.782, 1.205] | 1.052 [0.941, 1.189] | 1.073 [0.949, 1.210] |
| Moranʼs I for CAR term Proportion of variance explained by: | 0.206 | 0.275 | 0.214 | 0.270 |
| City random effect | 0.054 [0.035, 0.079] | 0.119 [0.074, 0.177] | 0.033 [0.018, 0.052] | 0.104 [0.076, 0.138] |
| CAR random effect | 0.195 [0.149, 0.242] | 0.046 [0.002, 0.179] | 0.320 [0.258, 0.383] | 0.011 [0.000, 0.054] |
Notes: Bold indicates CI does not include null value of IRR = 1.000. IRR = incidence rate ratio; CI = credible interval; CAR = conditional autoregressive.
Per $10,000 increase;
per 10,000 unit increase;
per 100,000 unit increase;
per 10% increase.
