Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 8;77(1):68–76. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.68

Table 4.

Hierarchical Bayesian Poisson models for counts of alcohol outlets in census block groups (n = 8,877) nested in 50 cities, with random effects for cities

graphic file with name jsad.2016.77.68tbl4.jpg

Variable Model 1b: All outlets IRR [95% CI] Model 2b: Bars IRR [95% CI] Model 3b: Restaurants IRR [95% CI] Model 4b: Off premise IRR [95% CI]
Area (ln) 1.495 [1.430, 1.561] 1.443 [1.351, 1.540] 1.538 [1.454, 1.631] 1.358 [1.316, 1.402]
Incomea
 Local 0.819 [0.799, 0.840] 0.773 [0.737, 0.810] 0.792 [0.768, 0.819] 0.861 [0.843, 0.880]
 Lagged 0.833 [0.799, 0.867] 0.804 [0.749, 0.865] 0.807 [0.759, 0.853] 0.892 [0.861, 0.923]
 City 1.360 [1.274, 1.452] 1.422 [1.244, 1.670] 1.493 [1.373, 1.629] 1.238 [1.132, 1.348]
Population
 Localb 2.281 [1.755, 2.962] 1.257 [0.809, 1.928] 2.145 [1.542, 2.986] 2.124 [1.722, 2.633]
 Laggedb 1.508 [1.404, 1.616] 1.306 [1.162, 1.476] 1.670 [1.528, 1.827] 1.344 [1.272, 1.420]
 Cityc 1.039 [1.001, 1.086] 1.042 [0.967, 1.130] 1.051 [1.006, 1.099] 1.017 [0.971, 1.069]
Whited
 Local 0.980 [0.933, 1.034] 1.039 [0.958, 1.129] 1.001 [0.934, 1.067] 0.977 [0.937, 1.021]
 Lagged 1.077 [0.993, 1.157] 1.221 [1.081, 1.378] 1.035 [0.939, 1.152] 1.097 [1.035, 1.161]
 City 0.962 [0.854, 1.053] 0.893 [0.733, 1.127] 0.915 [0.822, 1.039] 1.026 [0.911, 1.159]
Blackd
 Local 0.972 [0.909, 1.048] 0.993 [0.876, 1.124] 0.949 [0.858, 1.051] 0.993 [0.935, 1.057]
 Lagged 0.821 [0.738, 0.906] 0.838 [0.709, 0.995] 0.673 [0.579, 0.775] 0.913 [0.843, 0.985]
 City 1.111 [0.908, 1.324] 1.306 [0.928, 1.931] 1.098 [0.903, 1.360] 1.177 [0.948, 1.453]
Hispanicd
 Local 1.033 [0.990, 1.080] 1.059 [0.988, 1.136] 0.976 [0.922, 1.033] 1.063 [1.025, 1.105]
 Lagged 0.915 [0.851, 0.981] 1.057 [0.950, 1.170] 0.835 [0.769, 0.916] 0.985 [0.935, 1.036]
 City 1.049 [0.940, 1.147] 0.948 [0.782, 1.205] 1.052 [0.941, 1.189] 1.073 [0.949, 1.210]
Moranʼs I for CAR term Proportion of variance explained by: 0.206 0.275 0.214 0.270
City random effect 0.054 [0.035, 0.079] 0.119 [0.074, 0.177] 0.033 [0.018, 0.052] 0.104 [0.076, 0.138]
CAR random effect 0.195 [0.149, 0.242] 0.046 [0.002, 0.179] 0.320 [0.258, 0.383] 0.011 [0.000, 0.054]

Notes: Bold indicates CI does not include null value of IRR = 1.000. IRR = incidence rate ratio; CI = credible interval; CAR = conditional autoregressive.

a

Per $10,000 increase;

b

per 10,000 unit increase;

c

per 100,000 unit increase;

d

per 10% increase.