Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 13.
Published in final edited form as: Ind Labor Relat Rev. 2015 Jun 1;68(4):916–954. doi: 10.1177/0019793915586974

Table 5.

Employment and Weekly Hours Worked at Nine-Month Interview as Function of Accommodations at Two-Month Interview, without Restriction to Women Employed at Two-Month Interview

(1)
(2)
(3)
Employment Hours, unconditional Hours, conditional
Any accommodation, two-month interview
Any accommodation 0.042
(0.053)
2.690
(2.260)
1.294
(1.400)
N 552 552 487
Specific accommodations, two-month interview
Helper 0.042
(0.028)
0.312
(1.306)
−1.383
(0.852)
Shorter day −0.012
(0.029)
−0.601
(1.365)
−0.098
(0.843)
Allowed schedule change −0.010
(0.044)
0.048
(2.038)
0.256
(1.298)
Allowed more breaks 0.035
(0.034)
1.837
(1.486)
0.968
(0.953)
Special transportation −0.154**
(0.076)
−4.697
(3.257)
0.734
(1.598)
Job change −0.016
(0.041)
−1.946
(1.709)
−1.680
(1.157)
Help learning new skills 0.029
(0.048)
−0.420
(2.100)
−1.302
(1.462)
Special equipment 0.018
(0.053)
1.273
(2.389)
0.089
(1.491)
Assistance with
rehabilitative services
0.133**
(0.059)
12.122***
(3.272)
7.783***
(2.537)
N 537 537 474

Notes: Coefficients estimated from linear probability models for employment and linear regressions for hours. Controls include age categorized as < 37, 37 to 46, 47 to 56, or 57 and older; health insurance through their own employer; prediagnosis weekly hours worked; sets of dummy indicators for race, education, marital status, having children under age 18, household income, and whether the respondent’s job is a blue-collar job; indicator variables if job requires physical effort, concentration, heavy lifting, stooping/kneeling/crouching, analysis, learning new skills, good eyesight, or keeping up with pace of others; and year of interview (2007 to 2011). All models include the health status controls: indicators of chemotherapy or radiation at nine-month interview; cancer stage; and SF-36 physical and mental summary score and CESD-10 score at the nine-month interview. All models also include the job involvement indicator variables: that the patient agrees that the job is the major satisfaction; most important events involve her work; perfectionistic about work; lives, eats, breathes her job; and very personally involved in her work. For columns 1 and 2, N= 556; 19 observations had at least one response of “Refused” and were dropped. For column 3, N= 488; 14 observations had at least one response of “Refused” and were dropped. Robust standard errors are shown in parentheses.

*

Indicates p < .1,

**

p < .05,

***

p < .01.