Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 1;53(1):491–500. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-2008-8

Table 1.

Second-order designs matrix used for evaluating bread Quality of blend

Samples
#
Coded Uncoded Ca3CI2 CaLA2
Ca In Ca
(g/Kg)
In
(%)
Wabs
(%)
td
(min)
tf
(min)
Wabs
(%)
td
(min)
tf
(min)
1 −1 −1 1.20 1 53.4 9 75 ± 7 g 51.3 17 66 ± 4bc
2 1 −1 2.40 1 53.5 25 47 ± 1b 52.0 13 81 ± 15d
3 −1 1 1.20 12 52.0 31 32 ± 2a 53.0 34 49 ± 9a
4 1 1 2.40 12 52.5 33 49 ± 9bc 52.6 29 62 ± 5ab
CP 0 0 1.80 6.5 52.0 34 56 ± 3 cd 51.2 23 70 ± 15bcd
8 −1.2 0 1.08 6.5 50.2 21 65 ± 1de 51.3 20 76 ± 15bcd
9 0 +1.2 1.80 13 52.8 29 39 ± 2a 54.0 30 63 ± 9ab
10 1.2 0 2.52 6.5 49.6 20 62 ± 3de 51.0 18 48 ± 4a
11 0 −1.2 1.80 0 53.7 24 65 ± 2ef 53.3 11 79 ± 4cd
C 0 0 0 0 56.0 12 67 ± 4f 56.0 12 67 ± 4bcd

Different letters in the same column indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Mean ± SD

CP Central Point (3 replicates), C Control (outside of the design), W abs water absorption, t d development time, t f fermentation time