Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 1;53(1):491–500. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-2008-8

Table 3.

Predicted and experimental value of the responses variables at optimum formulation

Responses variables Optimal bread
Predicted value Experimental value Range
Ca 3 CI 2 Moisture (%) 39.2 40.2 ± 0.5 37.35–40.94
Cohesiveness (−) 0.48 0.52 ± 0.01 0.44–0.55
Chewiness (N) 6.0 4.8 ± 0.5 5.1–7.0
Vs (cm3/g) 2.20 2.50 ± 0.04 2.00–2.30
CaLA 2 Moisture (%) 40.6 40.6 ± 0.1 40.33–40.80
Cohesiveness (−) 0.51 0.50 ± 0.01 0.50–0.52
Chewiness (N) 7.0 5.3 ± 0.6 6.07–7.93
Vs (cm3/g) 2.5 2.3 ± 0.9 2.37–2.61

Mean ± SD. Range: Confidence interval of the numerical optimization (95 %)