Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 22;113(1):58–63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1512651112

Table S3.

Lake carbon efflux by two-digit HUC

Two-digit HUC Lake area, km2 Lake surface flux, TgC⋅y−1 Lake surface yields, gC⋅m−2⋅y−1
01 6,179 0.66 (0.17–0.21) 106.34 (78.76–140.54)
02 4,040 0.6 (0.27–0.47) 148.69 (80.83–265.25)
03 15,702 2.51 (0.86–1.24) 159.87 (104.84–238.62)
04 7,246 1.1 (0.3–0.4) 152.13 (110.2–207.36)
05 3,431 0.43 (0.13–0.2) 125.22 (87.82–184.55)
06 2,722 0.24 (0.2–0.36) 89.48 (16.24–220.02)
07 11,156 0.72 (0.27–0.39) 64.11 (40.19–99.37)
08 10,014 2.31 (0.85–1.14) 230.34 (145.53–343.7)
09 7,940 1.12 (0.48–1.03) 141.66 (81.57–270.98)
10 15,703 1.15 (0.25–0.28) 73.38 (57.54–91.44)
11 8,295 1.81 (0.41–0.5) 218.43 (169.04–278.23)
12 8,984 2.01 (0.74–1.28) 223.33 (140.59–365.59)
13 1,313 0.14 (0.1–0.15) 107.04 (32.08–222.06)
14 1,755 0.09 (0.06–0.1) 51.68 (15.02–109.2)
15 1,372 0.07 (0.04–0.06) 47.61 (15.49–87.76)
16 7,951 0.49 (0.26–0.28) 61.47 (28.97–96.84)
17 Coast 1,133 0 (0–0) 18.84 (0.93–43.89)
17 Dry 6,210 0.1 (0–0.3) 18.84 (0.93–43.89)
18 Dry 6,006 0.4 (0.1–0.9) 74.5 (24.47–155.72)
 Total 127,151 16.0 (14.3–18.7) 111.21 (64.79–182.37)

Lake surface area was determined by the NHD by HUC. Total carbon flux is calculated according to (17). Errors in parentheses represent the fifth and 95th confidence intervals around the mean.