Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 13;11(1):e0147162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147162

Table 5. Best-fitting predicted models.

i = difference in AICc from best-fitting model; ωi = Akaike weight. See text and Table 3 for model specifications. All models with ∆i<4 are listed. ∆i for best-fitting models is always 0 and so not shown. For four measures (self-enhancement, categorisation, horizon ratio and additional objects), the global model did not fit the data so model comparison was not possible. See S1 Table for full model comparison statistics.

Measure Best fitting models (where ∆i < 4)
Individualism HORIZONTAL (ωi = 0.80)
Collectivism CULTURALGROUP (ωi = 0.58), GLOBAL (ωi = 0.25, ∆i = 1.70), VERTICAL (ωi = 0.16, ∆i = 2.57)
Closeness PARENTSBIRTH (ωi = 0.47), VERTICAL (ωi = 0.27, ∆i = 1.08), CULTURALGROUP (ωi = 0.18, ∆i = 1.90)
Self-enhancement Poor global model fit
Categorisation Poor global model fit
Dispositional attribution COUNTRYBIRTH (ωi = 0.41), CULTURALGROUP (ωi = 0.23, ∆i = 1.20), VERTICAL (ωi = 0.16, ∆i = 1.90), PARENTSBIRTH (ωi = 0.12, ∆i = 2.51), HORIZONTAL (ωi = 0.06, ∆i = 3.86)
Situational attribution CULTURALGROUP (ωi = 0.53), PARENTSBIRTH (ωi = 0.43, ∆i = 0.40)
Drawing task: Horizon ratio Poor global model fit
Drawing task: Objects Poor global model fit