Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0146478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146478

Table 1. Fluoride concentration (μg F/g) on enamel and dentine, according to the treatments (mean ± SD; n = 12), and values of regression analyses between treatments by substrate.

Treatmentsα (ppm F) Fluoride concentration (μg F/g)
Enamel Dentine
0 (control) 256.4±65.8 A,a 1105±331 B,a
150 439.4±200.0 A,b 3896±964 B,b
450 588.2±223.4 A,bc 4697±1113 B,bc
1,350 760.7±241.9 A,c 6133.±1280 B,c
Linear regression r = 0.665; p < 0.001 r = 0.688p; p < 0.001

Distinct capital letters indicate differences (p < 0.05) between enamel and dentine (values within lines)

Distinct lower case letters indicate differences (p < 0.05) among fluoride treatments (values in columns for enamel and dentine

α Concentrations to simulate brushing with toothpaste from low to high F concentration, considering the dilution (1:3) by saliva

All values transformed by log 10 to statistical analysis.