Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 1;2(4):333–340. doi: 10.1089/lgbt.2014.0053

Table 3.

Predictors of BMI Among Lesbians with Bootstrapped Confidence Intervals

  B β CI R R2 F p
Step 1       .33 .11 9.77 .001
 Age .32* .18 [.17, .49]        
 Income −.21* −.11 [−.36, −.07]        
 High School .55 .02 [−1.63, 2.66]        
 Some College 2.72* .17 [1.30, 4.26]        
 Graduate Degree −1.30* −.08 [−2.43, −.09]        
 African American 1.90 .08 [−.01, 3.89]        
 Asian American −.27 −.01 [−2.60, 2.34]        
 Other −1.22 −.03 [−3.64, 1.14]        
 Children .45 .04 [−.38, 1.21]        
Step 2       .36 .13 7.71 .001
 Public Identification as a Lesbian −.08* −.16 [−.12, −.04]        
 Connection to Lesbian Community .01 .02 [−.05, .07]        
 Personal Feelings as a Lesbian .06 .04 [−.11, .21]        
 Attitudes Toward Other Lesbians −.01 −.01 [−.12, .08]        
 Depressive Symptoms .14* .09 [.01, .26]        
Step 3       .40 .16 7.54 .001
 Relationship Length .28* .12 [.09, .48]        
 Relationship Consensus −.30* −.16 [−.46, −.14]        
 Relationship Satisfaction .09 .03 [−.17, .33]        
 Relationship Cohesion .08 .03 [−.11, .26]        
Step 4       .42 .18 7.35 .001
 Drinking Quantity −.17* −.19 [−.37, −.01]        
 Heavy Drinking 1.06* .16 [.18, 2.08]        
 Hazardous Alcohol Use −.14 −.08 [−.31, .04]        

B, β, and CI results are presented for the full model; R, R2, F, and p-values are for each step.

*

Significance based on 95% bootstrapped CI.

Statistically significant values are highlighted in bold.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure