Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 13;24:3. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0196-5

Table 2.

Clinical characteristics of patients who underwent preperitoneal pelvic packing (N = 14)

Variables N (%)
Injury mechanism
     Road traffic collision
         Driver 5 (35.7)
         Pedestrian 3 (21.4)
         Crush 2 (14.3)
         Passenger 1 (7.1)
     Fall 3 (21.4)
Associated injury (AIS > 2)
         Head & neck 3 (21.4)
         Face 3 (21.4)
         Chest 9 (64.3)
         Abdomen & pelvic contents 5 (35.7)
Pelvic fracture type (Young-Burgess type)
         Anterior posterior compression 2 4 (28.6)
         Anterior posterior compression 3 1 (7.1)
         Lateral compression 1 1 (7.1)
         Lateral compression 2 5 (35.7)
         Lateral compression 3 1 (7.1)
         Vertical shear 2 (14.3)
Open pelvic fracture 2 (14.3)
Abdominopelvic CT/ arterial blush 11 (78.6 %)/1 (9.1 %)
Emergency pelvic angiography 6 (50)
Embolization 2/6 (33.3)
PPP time (min) (n = 10) a 29.7 ± 6.0
Emergency external fixation 7 (50)
Hybrid operating room PPP 3 (21.4)

AIS abbreviated injury scale, CT computed tomography, PPP preperitoneal pelvic packing

a Patients who underwent concurrent laparotomy and cystostomy were excluded