Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 17;76(6):852–861. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2015.76.852

Table 4.

Representative family predictors of twin-reported parental monitoring in African American families, by predicted parental monitoring quintile

graphic file with name jsad.2015.76.852tbl4.jpg

Predicted probability of low parental monitoring
Lowest risk quintile (0-20th percentile)
Moderately low risk (21st-40th percentile)
Middle risk quintile (41st-60th percentile)
Moderately high risk (61st-80th percentile)
Highest risk quintile (81st-100th percentile)
Variable Reported Higher monitoring (n = 93) Reported Lower monitoring (n = 9) Reported higher monitoring (n = 82) Reported Lower monitoring (n = 20) Reported higher monitoring (n = 67) Reported lower monitoring (n = 31) Reported higher monitoring (n = 69) Reported lower monitoring (n = 32) Reported higher monitoring (n = 39) Reported lower monitoring (n = 57)
Parental marital status, n (%)
 Never married 12 (12.9) 4(44.4)* 36 (43.9) 10 (50.0) 29 (43.3) 10 (32.3) 37 (53.6) 17(53.1) 19 (48.7) 27 (47.4)
 Separated/divorced 0 (0) 0(0) 4 (4.9) 1 (5.0) 10 (14.9) 3 (9.7) 14 (20.3) 5(15.6) 7 (18.0) 15 (26.3)
 Missing 27 (29.0) 2 (22.2) 9 (11.0) 2 (10.0) 6 (9.0) 3 (9.7) 3 (4.4) 3 (9.4) 3 (7.7) 3 (5.3)
Mother history of alcohol problems (twin or dad report),a n (%)
 Problems 0 (0) 0 (0) 4 (4.9) 0 (0) 3 (4.5) 0 (0) 3 (4.4) 2(6.3) 18 (46.2) 32 (56.1)
 Missing 0 (0) 1(11.1) 0(0) 1 (5.0) 0(0) 1 (3.2) 0(0) 0 (0) 0(0) 0 (0)
Father history of alcohol problems (twin or mom report),b n (%)
 Problems 17 (18.3) 0 (0) 24 (29.3) 7 (35.0) 16 (23.9) 6 (19.4) 30 (43.5) 17(53.1) 24 (61.5) 36 (63.2)
 Missing 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (1.2) 0 (0) 1(1.5) 1 (3.2) 1 (1.5) 1(3.1) 3 (7.7) 3 (5.3)
Has an older sibling, n (%)
 Yes 62 (66.7) 4(44.4)* 37 (45.1) 11 (55.0) 15 (22.4) 7 (22.6) 7 (10.1) 9 (28.1)* 8 (20.5) 4 (7.0)*
 Missing 24 (25.8) 2 (22.2) 16 (19.5) 4 (20.0) 26 (38.8) 18 (58.1) 40 (58.0) 17(53.3) 23 (59.0) 28 (49.1)

Notes: Referent categories were married, no maternal/paternal history of alcohol problems, and no older sibling.

a

The test was not calculable for 0–20th percentile, 21st–40th percentile, and 41st–60th percentile predicted probability groups because there were not two or more groups in which both the top 75% and low 25% observed parental monitoring groups had nonzero cells;

b

the test was not calculable for 0–20th percentile predicted probability group because there were not two or more groups in which both the top 75% and low 25% observed parental monitoring groups had nonzero cells.

*

Indicates that within propensity score quintile the lowest 25% and upper 75% twin-report based parental monitoring groups differed significantly at p < .05.