Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Lang. 2015 Aug 26;149:135–147. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.07.007

Table 3.

Mean reaction times and median error rates per participant group and per presentation number within category in the blocked cyclic picture naming paradigm. Standard deviations (for reaction times) and interquartile ranges (for error rates) are in brackets.

Reaction times (in msec)

Presentation #
2 3 4 5 6 Average
Left PFC patients HOM 824 (67) 829 (77) 844 (81) 836 (64) 863 (63) 838 (140)
HET 788 (53) 800 (63) 774 (52) 771 (59) 782 (63) 783 (115)

Aged-matched
controls
HOM 831 (49) 827 (47) 814 (53) 828 (60) 822 (53) 824 (102)
HET 783 (42) 782 (51) 767 (47) 763 (54) 760 (55) 771 (97)

Error rates (in %)

Presentation #
2 3 4 5 6 Median

Left PFC patients HOM 32
(19–42)
22
(13–32)
26
(23–30)
26
(20–31)
22
(18–24)
25
(17–33)
HET 17
(6–25)
11
(11–15)
8
(8–10)
8
(6–10)
11
(4–16)
10
(6–17)

Aged-matched
controls
HOM 7 (3–13) 6 (3–10) 8 (3–13) 10 (1–14) 7 (1–13) 8 (3–14)
HET 7 (1–8) 6 (1–6) 3 (3–8) 4 (1–6) 1 (0–8) 4 (0–8)